neuroscience – languagesciencey

Preserving language with age

TYG — Tue, 13 Oct 2026 19:05:00 +0000

It’s trite knowledge that our brain function changes as we get older, but how it changes stays in a mysterious realm. Language function, interestingly enough, is commonly thought to remain relatively stable as we age. Billot et al. (2026) found that though neural networks supporting executive function was less consistent and connected in older adults than younger adults, activity in the language network was similar across ages.

How did they find this out?
The research team mapped network features using precision functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as participants completed two tasks; one was a reading task to test the language network and the other was a spatial working memory task to test broader executive function. A subset of participants also completed a resting state scan (to measure brain activity while not doing a task) and a passive listening task. Together, these different aspects of the experiment provided the data for analyses into language network or domain-specific activity and executive or domain-general activity.

Wait, what’s that again? Click here for a quick review on Executive Function and fMRI

Traces of a Lost Language

TYG — Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:56:14 +0000

The language you were born into may remain embedded in your neural architecture long after you’ve disassociated with it. Not everyone will undergo this linguistic dissociation; some continue using their parents’ language, naturally adopting it as their own as they remain in an environment that empowers its use. Others, however, may organically distance themselves from its roots. This is not always a dramatic divorce, but one of subtle erosion following environmental or cultural shifts (such as immigrating to another country at a young age or entering a school system whose primary language differs from the original mother tongue). Yet, the roots echo in the neurological substrate.

Seeing the birth language’s impact

Barbeau et al. (2025) used diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to examine the enduring effects of a birth language on the white matter of the brain. They found that international adoptees from China who grew up in a French-language environment in the first two years of their life still showed a neural architecture reflecting their Chinese birth language. This neural architecture persisted even though they did not speak nor use the birth language in the present day. These participants were categorized as monolingual French speakers, but the language regions of their brains showed white matter connections that were more similar to Mandarin-first-language (Mandarin L1) speakers than French-first-language speakers (French L1). This retention of specific white matter tract patterns may be due to the tonality of the birth language (Mandarin), rather than it simply being a different first language (Barbeau et al., 2025).

How early can a language impact one’s brain?

More research needs to be done to see whether different birth languages, not just tonal ones, yield similar artefacts in the neural architecture. The impact of a language may even begin to build inside the womb, before birth. Listening to a language as a fetus may influence the brain’s speech processing patterns immediately after birth (René et al., 2025), so the imprints of a pre-birth language may enhance or counter those of the birth language.

And after birth?

Disregarding the graphic picture this phrasing evokes, the impact of languages after birth continues to be a source of fascination as researchers ponder the pliability of the critical period of language learning and the boundless potential of learning languages across ages. Youth may confer easy cognitive flexibility, but research may uncover how aging cognitive networks could forge a similar flourish.

References

https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-025-08954-4

Barbeau, E. B., Pierce, L., Deschamps, S., Kousaie, S., Gilbert, A., Chen, J. K., Baum, S., & Klein, D. (2025). Early but discontinued exposure to a language exerts lasting effects on white matter architecture in the brain. Communications biology, 8(1), 1575. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-08954-4

https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-025-08594-8

René, A., Caron-Desrochers, L., Tremblay, J. et al. Prenatal linguistic exposure shapes language brain responses at birth. Commun Biol 8, 1155 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-08594-8

For more info on critical period of language learning and language learning as we age:

https://news.mit.edu/2018/cognitive-scientists-define-critical-period-learning-language-0501

https://theconversation.com/your-age-shouldnt-put-you-off-learning-a-new-language-what-the-research-says-263581

Aging in Multilingual

TYG — Wed, 24 Dec 2025 03:45:00 +0000

Multilingualism mystifies me with its modest magic. Being able to share a thought with another through language is already useful, and then to amplify this prowess along a different dimension is nothing short of beautiful. Many researchers have prodded the possibility of multilingual benefits and evidence continues to accrue in favour of these advantages.

One such area is in brain aging, where bilingualism or multilingualism has shown to confer some protection on our cognition. Cognition is what we call our process of learning, experiencing, and thinking (Bayne et al., 2019) and is an area language researchers explore to gauge the effects of languages on our thoughts, thinking, and memories. As with many things, cognition is subject to the less pleasant aspects of aging.

Yet, cognitive reserve, a feature of cognition, is one that may be bolstered by one’s use of languages. Cognitive reserve can be described as the buffer between an intangible thinking and a physical brain that can sustain some cognitive function, despite a crumbling of physical mass. Knowing more than one language, as is in the case of bilingualism, can support cognitive reserve into old age and improve performance compared to those who speak one language (Bialystok, 2021). Bilingualism in earlier life stages may even create a cognitive protective effect that endures into old age (Ballarini et al., 2023). This is concluded from results on tasks or activities and/or through brain structure itself.

How do we measure cognition?